法学研究

文章摘要

中国法治语境下的司法建议:机理、运用与制度完善

Judicial Recommendation in the Context of the Rule of Law in China: Mechanism, Utilization and System Improvement

DOI：

英文关键词: judicial recommendations; social governance; judicial policy; judicial adjudication; judicial authority

基金项目:

作者	单位
顾培东	四川大学法学院

摘要点击次数: 38

全文下载次数: 4

中文摘要:

司法建议是一项具有浓厚中国特色的司法实践与制度,司法建议的实际运用和功能随着中国法治进程的时代变迁呈现阶段性特征。当下司法建议已是司法参与国家和社会治理的重要方式,并因其广泛运用而成为与司法裁判并存的司法产品。司法建议制度建基于四个要素:司法所特有的“社会负面症候”观察视角;司法作为国家和社会治理主体的职责及司法功能充分显现与释放的内在愿望;突破司法裁判固有局限的实际需求;司法权威的影响与司法建议的协商沟通姿态。这四个要素塑造了司法建议作为常规性司法产品的品性与地位。对部分司法建议运用的实证分析显示,司法建议具有多种类型和形式以及多方面的功能和效用,司法建议的实际运用中也存在一些困惑与矛盾。完善司法建议制度应着眼于三个方向:健全司法建议常态化产出与运用机制,提升司法建议的质量与水平,强化司法建议的社会影响力。

英文摘要:

As a judicial practice and institution with strong Chinese characteristics, judicial recommendations present stage-specific features in terms of their actual application and functions as they have evolved with the course of rule of law in China. Due to their extensive use, judicial recommendations have become an important means of judicial participation in state and social governance and a product coexisting with judicial decisions. The institution of judicial recommendations is based on four fundamental elements, i. e., the viewing perspective of “the symptom of social negative part” that is specific to judicial, the inherent desire of the fully showing and releasing of judicial duty and function as the subject in state and social governance, the actual need of breaking through the inherent limitation of judicial decisions, and the effect of judicial authority and the negotiation posture of judicial recommendation.These elements shape the nature and status of judicial recommendations as a regular judicial product.Empirical analysis of some judicial recommendations reveals their various types and forms and multiple functions and utilities, while certain confusions and contradictions in their practical utilization can also be found. To improve the judicial recommendation institution, efforts should focus on three main directions, including establishing a normalized mechanism for producing and utilizing judicial recommendations, improving the quality and standard of judicial recommendations, and enhancing the social effect of judicial recommendations.

查看全文下载PDF阅读器

关闭