|
| 票据犯罪若干问题研究 |
| A Study of Questions of Instrument Crime |
| |
| DOI： |
|
中文关键词:
票据;票据犯罪;银行结算凭证;伪造票据
|
| 英文关键词:
|
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1121 |
| 全文下载次数: 634 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 票据犯罪主体因罪而异，有的票据犯罪一般个人主体、一般单位主体不能实施，只有特殊个人主体、特殊单位主体才能实施。有的票据犯罪主体必须具有票据当事人身份，非票据当事人不能成为该项犯罪主体。票据犯罪罪过形式是故意和过失，模糊罪过和混合罪过的观点并不适用刑法所要求的票据犯罪。银行结算凭证虽然不是票据，但是应该归属票据犯罪对象范畴。我国刑法应当承认票据无形伪造。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The subjects of crimes involving negotiable instrument are different in various cases. Some crime of this kind cannot be committed by an ordinary individual or ordinary unit as the subject, and only can be committed by a specific individual and specific unit. Some subject of the crime must have the status of a party to a negotiable instrument, it is impossible for a non-party to become the subject of the crime. The types of crimes concerning negotiable instrument consist of both intentional and negligentcrimes. Views on buggy offense and mixed offense are not applicable to such crimes as stipulated in the Criminal Law.There are nine behavior patterns in crimes involving negotiable instruments. but illegal filling in the content of the instruments. Banking settlement voucher cannot be rendered as instruments. Howver it shauld be classified as objects of instrument crime. Intangeable forsification of instruments should be accepted in the Chinese criminal law. |
|
查看全文
下载PDF阅读器
|
| 关闭 |
京公网安备11010102006664号 京ICP备2023015853号