法学研究

文章摘要

解释论、语用学和法律事实的合理性标准

DOI：

英文关键词:

基金项目:

作者	单位
李力,韩德明	南京师范大学法学院;江苏警官学院

摘要点击次数: 1116

全文下载次数: 3291

中文摘要:

法律事实是人们在诉讼过程中对客体事实的认识结果，这一认识开始于个别主体对客体事实的经验和感受。当经验者用言语方式表达其对客体事实的经验和感受时，客体事实便转换成语言流传物。诉讼过程就是各方主体以言语方式表达事实主张，以寻求主体间的共同理解和解释，从而建构法律事实的过程。在这一过程中，制度性语境和规则成为主体间对话和评价的依据，在此基础上形成的共识便成为法律事实合理性的来源。真实性是法律事实形成的条件，而共识性应是法律事实的合理性标准。这就要求诉讼制度能够体现交往合理性，并要求诉讼程序尽可能保障交往合理性的兑现，以期有效地达至共识性真理标准。

英文摘要:

legal fact is the result of the recognition of objective fact in legal proceedings. This recognition begins with the experience of specific subject with the objective fact. When the experience with the objective fact is expressed with language, the objective fact is transformed into linguistic current. Litigious process is a process in which various subjects express with language their objective claims so as to seek common understanding and interpretation and construct the legal fact. In this process, institutional context and rules become the basis of the dialogue and evaluation between various subjects and the consensus reached on this basis become the source of rationality of legal fact. Truthfulness is the precondition for the formation of legal fact and consensus should be its rational standard. This requires that the litigation system reflect the rational association and that the litigious process ensure as much as possible the realization of rational association so as to effectively reach a consensus on the standard on truth.

查看全文下载PDF阅读器

关闭