法学研究

文章摘要

证据法学的理论基础——以裁判事实的可接受性为中心

DOI：

英文关键词: facts of verdicts;acceptability;pragmatism

基金项目:

作者	单位
易延友	清华大学法学院

摘要点击次数: 1237

全文下载次数: 651

中文摘要:

裁判事实的可接受性是诉讼证明的核心问题，也是证据理论和证据规则所要解决的首要问题。在当事人主义模式下，裁判结果的可接受性主要来源于程序的正当性；在职权主义模式下，裁判事实的可接受性则更多地来源于裁判事实的“客观性”。辩证唯物主义认识论无法为证明模式的建构提供指导，也难以为证据规则的设立提供合理的解释。适当借鉴实用主义哲学的合理因素，是重构我国证据法学理论基础的可行途径。

英文摘要:

The acceptability of a verdict is the core of legal proof procedures, as well as the principal problem of the evidence theories and rules. Under the model of inquisitorial system, the acceptability of a verdict depends on the legitimacy of the procedures, while under the model of adversarial system, the acceptability of a verdict depends more on the objectivity of the facts decided. From these viewpoints, this paper challenges the dialectical materialism epistemology as the philosophical basis of the current evidence law science, and argues that we should introduce the pragmatism properly, making use of its sound elements to reconstruct our proof model.

查看全文下载PDF阅读器

关闭