|
| “类推”与刑法之“禁止类推”原则——一个方法论上的阐释 |
|
| |
| DOI： |
|
中文关键词:
类推;罪刑法定;禁止类推原则;法学方法论
|
| 英文关键词:
analogy;a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime;prohibitive analogy rule;legal methodology |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1233 |
| 全文下载次数: 1135 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 将法律解释概念作狭义理解，具有方法论上的重要意义；如此，则法律解释方法中并不存在“类推解释”。从“法无明文规定不处罚”的基本要求和“法律解释必须在文义所及的范围内为之”这一命题出发，可以认为罪刑法定原则其实不排斥任何一种解释方法。事实上，“类推”在刑法领域是被作为法律续造的方法加以禁止的，而并非是被作为一种法律解释方法加以禁止。从维护法律确定性和司法统一性的要求出发，一切形式的类推在刑事司法中都应当被禁止；但是，这种主张显然源自于形式意义的罪刑法定和刑法技术主义的绝对观念。在实质意义的罪刑法定原则之下，有利于被告的类推应当被允许，这是克服刑法形式侧面的缺陷、实现刑法正义的需要。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| it is important to interpret the concept of legal interpretation narrowly in the filed of methodology, so that there isn't actually analogical interpretation existing in the legal interpretation. According to the basic requirement of nulla poena sine lege, the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime doesn't preclude any means of interpretation. In fact, analogy is prohibited in criminal law as a way to make law rather than a way to interpret the law. Some say that any form of analogy should be prohibited in criminal judicial activity in order to meet with the requirementsof legal confirmation and judicial oneness. Yet obviously, such an opinion comes f rom the formalistic principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime and the absolute concept of criminal technology. According to the substantial requirement of the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime, analogy favoring offenders should be allowed, thus to overcome the shortages of formalistic criminal law and to realize the justice of criminal law. |
|
查看全文
下载PDF阅读器
|
| 关闭 |
京公网安备11010102006664号 京ICP备2023015853号