法学研究

文章摘要

统一的诉讼举证责任

DOI：

英文关键词: civil procedure;burden of proof;allocation

基金项目:

作者	单位
李汉昌,刘田玉	中南财经政法大学法学院;中南财经政法大学法学院

摘要点击次数: 1086

全文下载次数: 1200

中文摘要:

举证责任的实质在三大诉讼法上都是将某些法律要件事实的举证义务分配给一方当事人 ,如果该当事人不能举证或不能证明该法律要件事实 ,裁判者则做出与该当事人利益相反的“事实拟定” ,并以此为基础做出判决。从罗马法到现代 ,只有两条举证责任的分配原则 :原告作为主张的肯定者 ,负有举证责任 ,被告作为主张的否定者 ,不负举证责任 ;原告作为主张的肯定者 ,不负举证责任 ,被告作为主张的否定者 ,负有举证责任。两条原则分别适用于不同的诉讼领域。

英文摘要:

The essence of the burden of proof is the same in three procedural laws. If the party, on whom the burden of proof is imposed, did not fulfill the duty, the judge would determine the case against him. From ancient Rome to the contemporary era, there have been two principles for the allocation of burden of proof:the accuser shouldprove what he claims to be true, but the defendant needs not to prove the accuser’s claim is false;the accuser need not prove what he claims to be true, but the defendant should to prove the accuser’s claim is false. The two principles apply respectively to different procedural area.

查看全文下载PDF阅读器

关闭