| When people discuss the institution of challenge for jurisdiction, they separate the purpose and value of the institution;consequently they derogate the actual function and value of the discussion,so they should return to the origin of the institution to study it over again. According to the presumption that adjudication is justice, the inaccurate jurisdiction is essentially a mistake made by the courts when they divide the interior work. So as long as the institution of challenge for jurisdiction provided by law could balance the two parties'advantage, the purpose of the institution is reached,without any necessity to enlarge it,which will result in the surplus procedure. The present institution of challenge for jurisdiction follows the court of second instance being that of last instance, which intentionally emphasizes the importance of jurisdiction to the parties, and misleads persons into the understanding of its procedural iu.Qtice. so it needs nerfectine and limitation. |
京公网安备11010102006664号 京ICP备2023015853号