法学研究

文章摘要

羁押必要性审查制度试点研究报告

Report on the Pilot Research on the Review of the Necessity of Detention

DOI：

英文关键词: arrest;detention;review of the necessity of detention

基金项目:

作者	单位
陈卫东	中国人民大学法学院

摘要点击次数: 1140

全文下载次数: 896

中文摘要:

为探索2012年刑事诉讼法第93条规定的羁押必要性审查制度的实施机制，中国人民大学诉讼制度与司法改革研究中心在A省W市开展了为期两年的试点研究。试点的内容是羁押必要性审查制度落实的各项支撑机制，包括归口管理、公开听证、风险评估、跟踪监督等。在两年试点期间，羁押必要性审查人数较之试点前增加了57.4%，占同期全市批捕人数的9.2%；适用案件范围逐步扩大，但仍然主要适用于审查起诉阶段的案件；审查后的释放或变更强制措施建议采纳率高达99.6%；在14%的案件中采用了公开听证的诉讼化方式进行审查，取得了良好的法律效果与社会效果。基于试点的发现，完善羁押必要性审查制度，需要在理论上明确：羁押必要性审查的制度性质是对逮捕适用条件的持续、定期审查，具有司法权属性，对羁押必要性审查应进行诉讼化改造并将建议权改为决定权；同时，应更新对侦查保密原则的传统认识，向辩方开示与逮捕适用条件有关的证据，以便辩方有效参与羁押必要性审查程序。

英文摘要:

In order to explore the mechanisms for the implementation of the detention review system provided by Article 93 of the Chinese Criminal Procedure Law, a two-year pilot research was conducted in W City of A Province. Tested in the pilot research were several supporting mechanisms for implementing the detention review system, including mechanisms for designated case management, public hearing, risk evaluation, follow-up supervision, etc. During the two-year period of pilot research, the total number of detainees undergone detention review had increased by 57.4%, consisting 9.2% of all detentionees in the city; and public hearing had been held in 14% of piloted cases, leading to better legal effects and social feedback. The pilot research shows that several theoretical issues need to be addressed in order to improve the detention review system:the nature of the detention review should be that of a continuous and periodical judicial review of conditions of arrest; its procedure should be adversarial and the prosecutors should be able to make release decision, not only recommendations. In addition, the confidentiality of investigation should be adjusted so that information about the necessary evidence on arrest can be disclosed to the defense to facilitate its effective participation for the review of the necessity of the detention.

查看全文下载PDF阅读器

关闭