法学研究

文章摘要

论政策对刑事诉讼的作用

The Influence of Policy on the Criminal Procedure

DOI：

英文关键词: policy; criminal procedure; the rule of procedural law; procedural legal relationship; allocation of judicial resources

基金项目:

作者	单位
孙皓	天津大学法学院

摘要点击次数: 8

全文下载次数: 0

中文摘要:

中国刑事诉讼的常规运行及制度演变,很大程度上会受到不同维度政策的影响。立足于整体主义的治理观念,政策对刑事诉讼产生影响具有历史必然性;政策功能与程序立法之间相得益彰的关系,亦印证了政策对刑事诉讼产生影响具有现实合理性。经由多元化且周期性的、着力于刑事诉讼法律关系变化的政策实施,司法资源配置在不同阶段往往呈现出向特定热点相对集中的趋势。类似的热点效应可能透过某些类型的刑事案件发生作用,也可能直接体现在若干具体的诉讼行为上,继而影响程序形态的变动和重塑。这一过程的形成及巩固,源于政策作用的主要方式及基本路径。但是,政策的存在及影响亦不能超越合理限度,即不能超越“立法主导—政策补充”的基本格局。为此,针对政策执行中可能出现的某些偏差与异化现象,须予以客观辨识并提出一定的因应方案。

英文摘要:

The routine operation of criminal procedure and its institutional evolution in China are inevitably shaped by diverse policy interventions. Based on the governing notion of holism, the ability of policies to exert such influence on criminal procedure is rooted in historical necessity. The mutually reinforcing relationship between policy functionality and procedural legislation affirms the rationality of the above influence sufficiently. Diversified and periodic policy releases and implementations which aims to change procedural legal relationships has led to a relative clustering of judicial resource allocation towards specific hot spots at different stages. Such a hotspot effect may materialize through specialized categories of criminal cases or manifest directly in concrete legal actions, consequently inducing adaptations and systemic recalibrations of the procedural struction. The formation and consolidation of the above process are closely related to the basic path of policy implementation. However, the existence and impact of policies must remain circumscribed within reasonable boundaries, requiring scrupulous preservation of the governance framework for “legislation-led development with policy support”. Therefore, objective identification and appropriate respond should be given to potential deviations or alienation phenomena in policy implementation.

查看全文下载PDF阅读器

关闭